@mike
active 7 years, 9 months agoForum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 5, 2016 at 11:10 am #17613
roughly translated from Google Translate
Noble, what are you doing? There is still so much stupidity. ****death***immortal then allow a villain
-
August 4, 2016 at 11:13 pm #17580
So wait, is this part of the show too? You crazy kids have spent the last week trying to fool us all with your top secret plan and forum acting “abilities”…and we’re supposed to believe this now? Come on guys. Any little bit of trust we had for you is now gone.
-
August 4, 2016 at 3:26 pm #17519
My takeaway: it doesn’t matter who gives/says the message, what’s important is that the message is heard by the people
-
August 4, 2016 at 10:16 am #17421
Also, the box…this was the photo Buz posted, but the box last night looked to have no writing on it at all. So where’s the real box? Why was it switched?
-
August 4, 2016 at 9:59 am #17419
I see you lurkin, they creepin
-
August 4, 2016 at 3:03 pm #17505
What you say makes sense, but what no one has mentioned yet is Gatekeeper 5. He was not killed (that we know of) in order for Four to become the next Gatekeeper. He left in an eloquent way, with a good bye letter saying he “must receive his ultimate reward”. Some think he could have been “promoted” and then ended by III or maybe the “ultimate reward” is death.
Actually, as I’m typing it out, if death was the “ultimate reward”, that would fit your theory pretty well @addisonborn
-
August 4, 2016 at 11:52 am #17464
Ahh ok, I getcha. That very well could be. It’s like you said, “We shape Tension”.
With that being said – Ascension should have bowls of candy, specifically Peanut Butter M&Ms, and mac and cheese.
-
August 4, 2016 at 11:47 am #17462
Totally understand…except I do disagree on one part
“He also did this on his own with the help of the OOA” – We do not know this as fact just yet. Sure it seems that way, but until 2, III, Regent 7, or Buz comes here and (hopefully) drops some knowledge, we are just throwing theories around still.
-
August 4, 2016 at 11:43 am #17461
I don’t think is the lack of balls, I think it was more of having an opportunity. It’s not like we can just see III on the street and take him out.
-
August 4, 2016 at 11:25 am #17447
Totally get it, BUT, and this is a more rhetorical question, so no need to answer it, just think about it….What if what Four had said (during the first attempt with the pill) about how killing III would save countless others, would that murder not be for the greater good and saving lives…even if it meant killing someone? If you look at it like that, would you not still stand with someone who had that as a motive?
-
August 4, 2016 at 11:10 am #17442
and Two as well 😉
-
August 4, 2016 at 11:09 am #17441
Naw son, I don’t turn my back on my friends.
Case in point, I’d still with any of you BoS detractors even though you’re all doing something I don’t agree with.
-
August 4, 2016 at 11:05 am #17438
Team Snicker(s) 😀
-
August 4, 2016 at 10:52 am #17430
There’s the response I was expecting, so thank you for that.
To your points:
– “Mike, when are you going to give it a rest” – Never. Why would I? It seems I’m one of the only people who aren’t afraid to call people on their shit. I have my own Archive of Knowledge that I like to use and bring up points that people seem to conveniently forget. Ever think this is the reason we can’t edit posts after 5 minutes? Everything on here is a living history. Some people may like to move on, but I like to remember and remind.
– Up here on team “FE” and trying to come for anyone because you can’t be scribe again? – You think that’s what this is about? How cute! I’m team “FE” because…well, I already explained it. All sides are a joke right now, not giving answers, being sketchy and untrustworthy, murder, etc.
Everyone knows you’d be all up in that GK2 action if she really made you scribe. – Again, cute answer. Two killed Four…cowardly…and is playing the “victim” card. If she had me be Scribe again, that doesn’t mean anything in regards to her. The “Scribe” title doesn’t mean I have to “be all up in that GK2 action”. I’m one of the few that never liked Addison and also one of the few that hasn’t changed their position. Right Mr. Fuck the OOA…oh jk, let me back in, phew thanks, oh jk again, Fuck the OOA”.
(Everyone saw your original post, you were ready to kiss ass again when she mentioned you before editing the post). – You think me being gracious for a title given back to me, that was stripped of me, is ass kissing? Well it’s not, it’s common courtesy. You may not like your boss, but when he tries to do something nice, you’re not going to be a dick to him right?
All you need to know is it’s safe to say you won’t see Buz sitting with us come scare LA – So you’re turning your back on your “brother” who you wanted by your side? Good to know. glad the BoS treats things like the lunch room at school. You can’t sit with us! lol
So for everyone thinking they want to go to the BoS side, remember that they won’t stand by you, or sit with you, when shit goes down
-
August 4, 2016 at 10:12 am #17420
How quickly we all forget. Do you not stand with your “brother” anymore? Also, OOA sanctioned? Wasn’t he one of yours?
-
AuthorPosts