@thegilded
active 7 years, 9 months agoForum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 13, 2016 at 10:11 pm #10287
I had an interesting night, which included an unusual voicemail from @coryphella. The transcript is as follows:
Sean, I have some crazy information about who and what the OOA really is. When you look back, it was always there. They are trying to gather up all of our vulnerabilities, and they know yours. Sean, I am looking at a file of you right now. The things in here… I need you to listen. They have marked you. They are going to– ((END OF VOICEMAIL))
-
June 13, 2016 at 8:39 pm #10232
I sincerely hope that we see you more around here. We could certainly use someone of your skills
-
June 13, 2016 at 12:28 am #10161
Been a crazy weekend that’s stopped me from interacting for the most part, but these letters are extremely curious. First and foremost, I’ll re-address the Sentry issue. We’ve never received solid confirmation, but my understanding is that it’s a newer role that wasn’t needed until forums, social media, etc were utilized. @mkarrett and I aren’t officially recognized members of the OOA, or honored the way that @mike is, but we are a newer role that protects Aspirants and Disciples in the forums, and provide support to them. Especially since I believe that this document is a bit older, I’m not surprised that Sentry is not included on the structure.
I’d like to further comment on @mumumusings, you should be aware that, while the OOA does deserve our loyalty for showing us the Light, those that went on video claiming that they were “A part of the Church of Anoch” and such didn’t actually claim that directly, they were video-taped saying the opposite, that they were NOT members. They had their videos edited so that it would seem as though they were saying the opposite. Mike soon after saw the Light and rose to Scribe, while Sean the Fallen… well, we know how he’s turned away from it.
I’m particularly curious about the organizational structure, as others have commented on. I’m extremely curious as to who else, outside of the Tension Circle, is connected to the Gatekeepers. They seem to have at least 8 other roles connected to them. Further, there seem to be several roles that we have not been either introduced to, or at least we’ve been interacting with members of these roles without knowing it. For example, many have spoken with Aleister. We know he is not a Gatekeeper, is he a Chaperone? A Guide? In my conversations with him, he’s spoken of the Clockmakers, so I’m certain enough that he’s not in that group, but I’m not certain what his role is.
-
June 11, 2016 at 8:20 pm #10111
That’s an incredibly unique way for III to answer our questions… We got an organizational chart, and we got the numbers explained to us.
Hats off to III, I didn’t think the answers would be this… awesome
-
June 10, 2016 at 4:52 pm #10034
23-8-5-18-5 4-9-4 25-15-21 18-5-3-5-9-22-5 20-8-9-19 13-5-19-19-1-7-5 6-18-15-13 23-8-15-13 20-8-9-19 3-15-4-5 9-19 8-1-18-4-12-25 19-5-3-21-18-5 23-8-25 13-21-19-20 23-5 19-16-5-1-11 9-14 9-20
-
June 10, 2016 at 1:55 am #9947
Aleister was my primary point of contact as Sentry. He grew increasingly concerned about his position and safety within the OOA. After III’s promotion to Gatekeeper, my communication with him essentially ceased. He was increasingly concerned with his imminent removal up until he went dark, and wished us all the best.
On behalf of the rest of us, I wish him the same. I sincerely hope that wherever his path takes him, he gets there safely.
-
June 9, 2016 at 2:45 pm #9866
Secondary question… @jkonigsberg – Has she had direct contact with you before? We know the OOA has your contact information, but unless you’ve spoken with her directly, the only way she could have gotten it would be to access OOA information directly, or may have a copy of the Institute’s information on her which may be a gold mine of information. Just yet another reason to get to her/whatever she’s left with the quickness
-
June 13, 2016 at 10:17 pm #10290
My guess? She had an experience similar to @endlesspictures ‘s, except she called me. I figured they were keeping a file on me, and all of us. I know at least I am doing the same, but I’m very… curious as to what they think my vulnerability is.
As for danger? Tense, yes. Whatever this weakness is, whatever this mark is… it means something. But danger? Not danger, not right now. The only thing I feel is a great swell of pity towards anyone coming to my house looking for trouble.
-
June 13, 2016 at 4:16 pm #10199
This… this is awesome. Put that on a poster or sticker and I’d buy the crap outta it.
-
June 13, 2016 at 10:04 am #10178
The slight misalignment in the word “Anoch” at the top makes me think that this is an EXCEPTIONALLY well copied section from an open book, or a recreation of one. I’m certainly reading it as page 42/43.
But you’re right on the 242, now that we know that there were 242 originally anointed, it’s highly possible we’ll continue seeing that as a holy number.
-
June 11, 2016 at 8:44 pm #10116
She and I both are, but I suspect that it’s a relatively new position, and one less formally recognized by the OOA.
We act as moderators and go-betweens between the Disciples and the OOA, but we don’t (or at least haven’t) gotten formal recognition in events or anything like that.
I like to think of us as bouncers. We don’t have a seat at the table, but we’re still employed by the same company. Make sense?
-
June 10, 2016 at 6:02 pm #10069
8-15-23 23-1-19 20-8-5 13-5-19-19-1-7-5 4-5-12-9-22-5-18-5-4 ?
6-1-3-5-2-15-15-11?
16-8-15-14-5?
9-14 16-5-18-19-15-14? -
June 9, 2016 at 3:31 pm #9883
I’ve long held the belief that if it’s even getting to us in the first place, the OOA is aware of it. Thus, it is not an issue of secrecy, but a race against them.
To that end, I vote to share
-
June 9, 2016 at 3:00 pm #9871
I’d very strongly encourage you to look into privacy laws before you install any such recording software.
Regardless of whether you’re being contacted by the OOA, Addison, or one of us, many states (including California) consider it a crime to record someone over the phone without both parties’ consent.
-
June 9, 2016 at 2:51 pm #9868
She warned you and called you for a reason, of that I’m certain. Whatever happens, you’re involved now. That means that as much as you can help her, you’re also a target.
Don’t stop what you’re doing, but watch your back…
-
AuthorPosts