@mkarrett
active 7 years, 7 months agoForum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 9, 2016 at 2:34 pm #9859
-
June 9, 2016 at 2:25 pm #9855
Oh my god!!
-
June 8, 2016 at 2:09 pm #9822
Oh hi guys,
Spoiler Alert below!
So call me a sucker for ciphers, I am. On Muthiloced’s profile page there’s a ceasar shift cipher that I decoded and relayed my answer with some of my thoughts to Muthiloced. I honestly don’t know if we should super focus in on this since we have quit a bit unsolved but I’m sharing anything I find:
The chaos ritual (Ringing of the Bell?)
Fire of purity (The Bonfire?)
Sigil of Mystery (OOA sigil?)
Pictures of Targets (The polaroids?)
It has been cast.You’re an interesting one, Muthiloced.
His response:
You are getting closer. 333 -
June 8, 2016 at 1:28 pm #9816
-
June 7, 2016 at 2:18 pm #9772
So one thing I wanted to point out that I’ll reveal at this point is that I initially had contact with Mr. or Ms. @muthiloced like…a week and half ago-ish? It’s kind a long story but you can hopefully make sense of my thought process:
1.) @light2dark posted the periscope diagram and the dashes below it. @daela I believe pointed out that the 6th line was linked back to the forum but I saw it as the 39th. Go to here to see what I mean.
2.) Okay so since that link on the 39th dash links right back to the forum that rang a bell for me to do the following search:
http://thetensionexperience.com/activity/39/Why? Because that’s where all activity occurs. Kinda a shot in the dark logic but it did yield to John First (@archdeacon).
3.) E-mailed this person with the header “39” and inquired a bit about him/her. Days later I get a response from @muthiloced with an interesting header “93”. Didn’t get much except his previous account (John First) was sadly locked out. I know some people here have been having tech difficulties so, I can understand. I asked about his profile pic* and didn’t get much except “There is still much fog around, what I can not explain. One clue leads to another.”
*His profile pic if you look closely, has sorta a clock at the top (the 3, 6, 9, D). I boldly asked him if he was the actual clock we need to wind.
I find @muthiloced fascinating and embrace the cryptics.
-
June 5, 2016 at 9:15 pm #9596
Maybe. I feel bad pointing this minor detail out but no stone unturned?
-
June 5, 2016 at 9:08 pm #9594
Good point, so either this was an oversight or my other theory, this is a video NOT from the OOA.
-
June 5, 2016 at 9:03 pm #9592
I call it a “2” on the big hump of the logo.
-
June 9, 2016 at 3:01 pm #9872
Exactly @thegilded, ya beat me to it!
-
June 8, 2016 at 2:29 pm #9826
-
June 8, 2016 at 1:39 pm #9818
That or ~four?
-
June 8, 2016 at 1:17 pm #9810
@111error, if you were to mess around with the mirror(s) enough of a periscope the light would simply not make it to the end user. I’m so bad with analogies but we, the Participants, are not showing the clues, that screws up the mirror of the scope? And the path of the light going through the scope won’t be seen by the end user (us)? So, tampering the periscope = we don’t move forward with the story?
Gah my brain hurts.
-
June 7, 2016 at 8:28 pm #9793
Which one? The little round one or the big profile header pic?
-
June 7, 2016 at 2:24 pm #9773
There was a reference in GK4’s letter “themythos”*. Doesn’t pinpoint to anything but it’s something to consider? Maybe?
Deconstruct, the opposite of create. Complain? Isn’t that always the EASY way? To feel closer to themythos?
-
June 7, 2016 at 2:01 pm #9769
DID SOMEONE SAY SUB CIPHERS?!
LET ME AT IT 😀
-
AuthorPosts