@thegilded
active 7 years, 9 months agoForum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 5, 2016 at 11:02 am #4645
@sabaki12 – The part that confuses me is that in many instances, the underscore before “path” is actually a link that basically just refreshes the page you’re currently on. Repeated references to time, path and searching makes me think that we’re meant to look for something we’ve missed here? On the forums or on the TheTensionExperience domain? Maybe winding the clock means it will only be available for a limited time or hasn’t happened yet and we should watch for it?
As @mike pointed out, the overstrikes in some of his posts are over for and am, combining to foram, maybe referencing the forums? Or maybe referencing four AM?
-
April 4, 2016 at 3:41 pm #4591
@daela – That’s actually a really cool idea… However, I’ve been monitoring the page source code and plugins used for most pages on the TheTensionExperience.com domain and none seem to have a place in which the pages are “listening” for keyboard entries like that
The closest thing is that some of the puzzles have options to turn off the background ominous music by pressing the spacebar, but that’s about as close as it gets
- This reply was modified 8 years, 7 months ago by Sean (@TheGilded).
-
April 4, 2016 at 12:48 pm #4566
@light2dark – Our path is a local redirect that bounces you back to which page you are currently on? Your name is very interesting, especially for a group of people seeking The Light. How did you come up with it? And how much do you know about Puzzle Tailor?
-
April 4, 2016 at 12:42 pm #4565
@diem – interesting idea. Assuming volumes are years and issues correspond with the month of publication, we’re looking at the 231st and 232nd issues. That’s an average of approx 4.4 of revisions to the questionnaire per month.
Assuming volumes correspond with events we’re not aware of, we can guess that the first publication was near The New Dawn, which would have been between 580-592 months/issues ago, which would be a bit under 2 revisions per month.
The timings aren’t insane, but that’s a whole lot of assumptions that I’m working off
-
April 4, 2016 at 11:55 am #4558
@diem – I saw the quiz late Thursday night, when it was still missing chunks. It was definitely 1024 then, as well. It was updated at least once since then, but the version number hasn’t been incremented since then.
Something’s important about the number 1024, otherwise changes would have changed the number. Maybe it’s the 1024 version of the questionnaire since The New Dawn? Maybe the number itself is important? 1024 is an important number in computer science, as it is a power of 2 (2^10 = 1024). No idea.
-
April 4, 2016 at 11:39 am #4556
Ah, got it. That’s the consultation number. As far as I know, Addison still keeps it active but we are beyond the point of consultations. Feel free to continue calling if you are so inclined, but I believe that the number you’re calling is for a stage of our initiation that has already passed.
-
April 4, 2016 at 11:28 am #4554
@jbrylah – Which number are you referring to? Did someone actually answer or did it just ring and go straight to the voicemail prompt?
At our current stage, there are two numbers readily available to us and by all reports they should only be voicemails and auto-generated prompts. The number set up for consultations has been near inactive for a while. If someone’s actually answering one of the two newer numbers, that’s an important data point
-
April 4, 2016 at 10:00 am #4537
@diem – I saw that, too. It used to be present on the forums page too, before it was made public. The service that the OOA uses to generate content for this site auto-fills other pages with pre-generated content unless someone manually overrides it.
I’d very much call it “out of bounds”. If you came to it the same way I did, you’ll see the “Last modified” timestamp which you’ll notice was years ago. Further research shows that other sites that use the same service have similar timestamps.
-
April 3, 2016 at 8:16 pm #4500
Personally, I’m more excited about a possible DeeZ update
-
April 3, 2016 at 8:12 pm #4498
@dthezombie – I won’t give you the answer, but if you need additional help I’d welcome you to contact me directly. I suspect that you have all the pieces but are having a simple misunderstanding that I believe is understandable. My contact information is my profile
-
April 3, 2016 at 8:05 pm #4496
@maryellison911 – Be not jealous, friend. Both “industry” and non-industry people were confirmed present at both consultations and library events, and reports have come in from both industry and non-industry people who’ve had unique interactions with detractors outside of that. It makes sense that those in the industry would be more public with their experiences, which would certainly make it seem like it’s only them that are involved.
It is patience and piety that will lead us to the Light, not jealousy.
-
April 3, 2016 at 1:28 pm #4468
@dthezombie – You’ve seen all there is to see. You just haven’t applied it yet
-
April 3, 2016 at 11:48 am #4463
@electrichippo – He’s spread misinformation, yes, but nothing truly malicious yet. I wouldn’t go with a public accusation, yet. I’d say that keeping tabs on him and his compatriots would be better until we see what their plan is. If we go on the offensive too early, they might go dark and we will have missed an opportunity to learn what the Detractors’ plans were
-
April 2, 2016 at 5:35 pm #4419
I’d say seeing Rosemary’s big day was definitely reward enough
-
April 2, 2016 at 3:15 pm #4398
@diem – You were able to scan it? I found it too low res to get a scan and had to decode the ISBN/EAN code. What memory item did you find?
-
AuthorPosts