Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 21, 2016 at 11:34 am #11284
Not word salad at all, I find it highly plausible.
-
June 19, 2016 at 10:02 pm #10958
“Little ol8 me” <– I am assuming that Four is not also Les Huit, because that would be too much. III being Two and One is enough numeric juggling. But what DOES the 8 mean in this context?
As for the impending schism, I expect most of us to rush to Four’s side. She does seem less murdery. But I’m not sure I’m comfortable with what’s happening to Addison. Four seems to be mocking III for being undercooked, but why did she leave at all, precipitating III’s rise to power? She said it herself, “III now takes the stage…even I think he is strange.” So why leave things in his care?
And what happened that necessitated Four’s presumptive merging with/possession of Addison? (I’m assuming this is what’s happening until informed otherwise.)
I have questions.
-
June 17, 2016 at 3:50 pm #10702
I count 3
-
June 16, 2016 at 10:58 pm #10611
Was it a sort of religious ecstasy, do you think?
Or was it that she had been subdued/quiet while under the influence of the OOA, and now she is herself again?
-
June 16, 2016 at 1:35 pm #10554
-
June 14, 2016 at 11:51 am #10359
Something I just noticed. On the newsletter draft that Andrew and Buz found, there was a handwritten note: “This must be given to controler[sic]! Left hand must know what right hand is doing!”
I don’t see “Controler” on this organizational chart.
-
June 13, 2016 at 11:07 pm #10306
Thank you so much for sharing, Megan, and thank you @mkarrett for working on this.
I can see why the OOA would not want us to have access to this text.
I notice that in the past, they had specifically “42” followers. Are they seeking to gain 42 devout followers among us? I don’t think they have that number yet. I wonder what will happen when they do.
-
June 21, 2016 at 10:01 am #11267
It looks like this is a different number, @nosnevets. The number you were searching was (424) 345-0716 but the result you found was for (424) 345-0796.
-
June 20, 2016 at 6:16 pm #11097
Read him to death, apparently?
-
June 20, 2016 at 5:04 pm #11065
When they asked you if you knew who it was…did you recognize the voice before you said yes?
-
June 20, 2016 at 5:02 pm #11063
It could also be a warning. Addison felt safe turning to Joe without fearing that he’d turn her in. Maybe whoever called was looking out for him.
Joe, male or female voice? Altered or unaltered?
-
June 16, 2016 at 6:35 pm #10580
Ooh, I like this. Some sort of Dollhouse-style body-hacking. That would also explain why III uses inconsistent pronouns. Maybe part of the host body is still conscious in there.
-
June 15, 2016 at 10:33 am #10462
Addison Barrow’s family
-
June 14, 2016 at 3:49 pm #10391
Yeah, clearly OOA Guide hasn’t been promoted yet. Wonder if a promotion is coming up for him/her.
-
June 13, 2016 at 11:12 pm #10310
“For Megan, from III” <— I think this indicates that III wanted us to have the UN-blacked-out portion of the article. So I’d imagine that the un-blacked portion is considered legitimate? The rest III probably considers a smear campaign, but he must feel that at least some of it is accurate, if he’s delivering it to us via Megan.
-
AuthorPosts